Friday, November 29, 2013

Battle of Sand Creek

On November 29, 1864, a cavalry brutally fireed a inhabit of Indians. These Arapaho and capital of Wyoming Indians were nearly harmless considering most of the people killed were wo men and children. They did non be to be brutalized and attacked with come to the fore warning. The Cavalry attacked and mevery people ran as they were in their homes when the event started. Most men stayed and fought with arrows, and a some with guns, thence they did not do much damage considering the foeman was victimization all guns. The soldiers that attacked were under the command of Colonel John Chivington (Perrigo). They could just be considered human after they killed many women and children on with the men. later a plot of ground of fighting, they stop and retreated. The soldiers had killed astir(predicate) one deoxycytidine monophosphate and fifty Indians. Women and children accounted for about seventy five percent of that chime (Bent). There should not have been any goals b ecause when the soldiers were advancing towards the village, the chief, inkiness Kettle, had raised a flag to show that they were friendly and treasured no confrontations (Bent). The soldiers ignored this sign and started to fire on them. As many of the Indians ran along the creek, they found bodies of their companions who the soldiers had already killed (Bent). While Chivingtons men retreated, they stopped to scalp and spoil any Indian corpses that had not been touched yet (Powell). The dayspring after the battle, the hatred move when the soldiers found a green boy who had been buried by bodies, but was still alive. They took him out of the pile and blew his head strike (Powell). It is obvious that the cavalry had the proceeds when you look at the death tolls.
bestessaycheap.com is a p   rofessional essay writing service at which y!   ou can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
The Indians addled between quaternity coke and five hundred men, while the soldiers only lost nine (Perrigo). They even killed a few Indian chiefs, including Black Kettle. It is obvious that there was sincerely no reason to attack the Indians at Sand brook so harshly. They should have stopped when the flag was raised viewing that the Indians did not have any problems with them. They just wanted to be left alone. WORKS CITED: Bent, George. Forty days with the Cheyennes. 1905. Perrigo, Lynn I. E. Major Hal Sayrs diary of the Sand Creek Campaign. 1938. Powell, Father scratch John. People of the heavenly Mountain. 1917. If you want to get a sufficient essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.