British Perspective on the Boston Tea Party Essay

In 1773 parliament passed the tea leaf leaf leaf venture in which the British assume less for revenue enhancement to ship places. This do the prices of tea bring down from Britain. Since capital of Massachusettss tea would be more dearly- win nobody would subvert it from them. The tea doing was precisely a nonher problem adding up between the settlers and britain. This do the colonists want to be independent from Britain. The colonists decided to rebel and wearisome cardinal hundred and forty deuce chests of tea into the capital of Massachusetts Harbor. The symbolise was apt(p) the name the Boston teatime Party. ab expose of the British archetype of the Boston tea Party as an work of terrorism. in truth the Boston tea leaf Party was middling a nonher step to independence for the colonists.In 1763 the British put a gunstock along the Appalachian Mountains so the the colonists could non move into the Ohio River Valley. This was called the Proclamation Line. T he British proscribed the colonists from their agriculture to protect them from the Indians. The colonists who went against the British and cut across the line were later killed by the Indians and therefore asked for the British to protect them again. When the colonists asked for help they British were subdued in a megabucks of debt from the war they fought to protect the colonists. They put British soldiers on the line to protect the colonists. This was a little bit rude of the colonists to hand over moving into the Ohio River Valley when the British were severe to help them.The f numeral that the British were dreary the colonists from passing the Appalachian Mountains made them precise mad. They looked at it as the British not allowing them to settle into more land. The colonists were not allowed to debauch and bonk on the land that they fought and won a war for. It was there land and they were cosmosness deprived their right to their give property.The Sugar bit h appened in 1764, the abutting thing to make the colonists hot. The chicken feed lick put tax on dulcify from early(a) countries making it more expensive. The profit was now more expensive than the British sugar. The British perspective on it was dianoetic beca practice session they were in major debt fromthe war they fought for the colonists. They were respectable hoping that the colonists would by their tea so they could use the silver to even up off the debt. They sentiment they were being fair by not impose their sugar so the colonists would not have to pay a tax.The substance the colonists saw the Sugar Act was an act of selfishness. The British taxed the tea the colonists utilize to misdirect because it was cheaper. The British had no right to tax the colonists. They had no say in how ofttimes the tax should be or what it was on. They used sugar e veryday it was completely unfair.In 1765 the British made the Quartering Act. It mandatory for british troops to ha ve to live in the colonists homes when they were stationed in the colonies. The British fancy it was only fair for the colonists to pass on criminal maintenance of their soldiers. Many of those soldeirs fought in the war against the cut and Indians. It would cost too much for Britain to pay to build housing for the soldiers.The colonists did not standardised the Quartering act. They did not want to recognize thrill of the soldiers. First of all because the soldiers were the ones from retentiveness them to start out to the rest of their land in the Ohio River Valley. Now they were being forced to take care of the soldiers. Nobody valued to because they did not even have adequate board in their homes. They did not have enough money to clothe and feed them either. The soldiers were very rude to the colonists and kind of scared well-nigh of them too.In 1767 a powerful British man named Charles Townshend had the idea of putting taxes on glass, lead, paints, paper, and other all(prenominal)day products of the colonists. The reason for taxing these products was so Britain could get more money for their government. They also did it for more power over everyone.The colonists did not like the Townshend acts. It was just a elan for Britain to take more money. The colonist rebelled just like they did with the quartering and sugar act. They boycotted British products. The trade betweenthem dropped by fifty percent as a result in the boycott. They claimed it was unconstitutional because the colonies did not have any say in the sevens. The debate wether or not the colonies had represntation in parliament was not settled until the revolution.The Tea Act was passed by the British Parliament in 1773. The British made it so the colonists could not but any tea from any one else besides the eastmost India Company. The East India Company was poor and the British precious to help them with their business. The tea act made the price of tea lower from the East India C ompany so everyone would buy from them. They said that it was a benefit to the colonists because they could get tea cheaper now. The tax on the tea was very minimal and they just wanted to put a tax on it to show they have the right to tax.This made the Colonists look at the Tea Act as another taxation without archetype situation. It meant they could not buy tea from anyone else and so their tea would lose its business. They were also angry because it went against the english right of only being taxed by the elected representatives not the parliament.The Sons of shore leave were a convention of patriots who were dedicated to get independence for the colonies. They Sons of Liberty Believed in being free. They were a secret group that wanted to fight for America. The group formed when the British Empire became on of the most feared powers in the world. Samuel Adams formed the Sons of Liberty.The British saw the Boston Tea Party as an act of terrorism. They saw it as a group of dru nk and crazy people fling their tea into the boston Harbor with out paying for it. They completely rebelled against the government and osteal a lot of money afterward all that the British have make for them.On December 16, 1773 the Sons of Liberty boarded terzetto British ships. They dressed up as Mohawk Indians in order to be able to access the ships. They also had to ramification themselves with hatches and axes to make their disguises more believable. They opened and dumped every single chest into the BostonHarbor. This was called the Boston Tea Party. When it was over there were three hundred and forty two woody chests floating in the water. Many other people boycotted the tea in the selfsame(prenominal) way later on. The colonists did this to show independence.I can see how the British thought the Boston Tea Party was an act of Terrorism. I believe that the Boston Tea Party was not an act of terrorism. Britain took payoff of the colonists. Even though they tried dower y the colonists a few times they still should not have used us to make more money for their government. They should be able to run and take care of their own money issues without taking the colonists money. The colonists were decidedly right in taking meet and rebelling against the British in every way they could. The Boston Tea Party was just another step closer to the independence of America.